\
|
THEIR NON CONTRAVENTION THE COUNCIL INSIST THEY WANT PAID. NOW about £1800. IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT I AM INNOCENT, AND PARKED LEGALLY, AND THEIR PICTURES PROVE IT. Pay
and display LEFT, resident on the RIGHT, Mine is green, but they
are right ---- falsely! There's a fascinating argument that
purports otherwise. The meaning of the word PURPORT that is
relied on and will be shown soon is. Camden's policy clearly profiled in terms of rational, psychological, scientific logical empricalism, Oops IMPERIALISM. Uphold ONE law ruthlessly & truthlessly, for non contraventions and trivia, while trivialinsg serial breaches of a dozen other offences. Get the book soon, and see how to tell a truth economically, economically for gain, and stay on the right side of the law, while breaking the rest and keeping them suppressed.
Click here for CASE
One, This examines the course of conduct of the COUNCIL, then PATAS, then TEC then the Bailiff's, followed by the county court, and how anything with the suffix .gov.uk will encounter the forces of reaction hidden behind agenda driven stealth for revenue. The Patas ruling, is now disambiguated, see here, and shows what one may expect at Patas, when an appeal is made with Camden Council at the helm. Case Two, Case Three, Case Four complex with a book.
THIS CASE ONE, is the Council's and PATIAS' NON CONTRAVENTION PICTURES the council can't fathom the warden gave illegally, and want money for, despite pushing this hard working citizen towards bankruptcy! Anything to follow the letter of the law, and laugh at its spirit.
THIS IS THEIR NON CONTRAVENTION PICTURE the council can't fathom the warden gave illegally! Coming very soon...... even IF his car were in some nightmarish dream the blue car, the parking bay lines are unenforceable. Either way he didn't break ANY LAW, just he spoke out for his innocence. Simply that. The council have managed a court procedure that legalises the plunder, in the same way as “weapons of mass destruction” was synthetically manufactured to provide a 'FALSE CAUSE in action' case and basis for war. The principles of such false cause synthetic semantic construction arguments are fully disambiguated, and should the council take their next move in criminal conduct, despite it's being 'L - AWFUL' the clarification shall begin, and the police may be called in. All judicial bodies that have assisted in the construction will be clarified. He may be made bankrupt, but the right to free speech, and freedom to receive and impart information still lives as a fundamental right in the EU Human Rights convention that Britain signed up to, in front of the world, but hides in the ukgh!. Click the picture to go to the case parts that have been released so far, only about 45 percent. The S-candal will be lit if this case goes further. To
provide context to this case, Have
a look at what the council are prepared to do, for punishment of
£120 late rent, while a citizen was tending her father in
hospital. CRUSH
HER “£20,000 Car.
Indeed crush
anyone that gets in their way! The councils are NOT alone, in this. If a debt is not honoured by someone who DOESN'T owe anything, the pressure mounts so high, this old lady committed suicide, and the bank simply said SOREEEE! Daily Express “I READ with disgust that a 61-year-old grandmother, hounded to sheer despair by debt collectors who claimed she owed nearly £16,000, finally ended her misery through suicide. Then it was discovered that the pursuing bank had got the wrong name and address. The real debtor was male and lived 200 miles away. Computer error, sorreeeee.” Britain Today! Have a nice day! THIS IS THEIR NON CONTRAVENTION PICTURE the council can't fathom the warden gave illegally! The
council's legal team argue it's the will of Parliament; ( with a
soporific pill of an argument. ) to enforce parking tickets that
are for NON contraventions. LOOK carefully at the pictures, they
came from the COUNCIL, they PROVE I parked correctly. EVERYTHING
in exchanges as to how court procedures were all compromised in
the zeal for money AT ANY PRICE, lawful OR unlawful. It's
starting by next week rolling out the full nature of the
council's code of conduct that reaches into the heart and soul
of government. |
|||
|
Case One And a BOOK (Top) A different case, far more substantial scandalous, coming on another site. Link being provided soon. The book early details that were prepared should be released shortly and provides an easy to learn rational, logical empirical approach to disambiguating the entire art of false emphasis, false cause persuasions, subliminal emphasis, and mind bending terminology that compel and persuade individuals to reason only with established legalise jargon, that guides one to an unaccountable system that buffers account-ability away from the directing minds. A serious treatise on critical thinking is shortly to be released that show how every sentence of spin can be dismantled instantly, A profoundly useful tool for disambiguation with over 30 basis rules, including references to 43 common classical fallacies, and very many 'fallacies of conduct'. It show convergent legal thinking with rulings that; where applied as they should to divergent class case law, are a complete mess, and amount to a charter for felons. The system is in a mess, The author faced the local council recently, and the Judge said, “Your system is in a mess”, “you have taken this man to the end of his tether”, and “are you doing a review?” DID they? Now let's not be foolish, of course not. This case is yet to be properly heard with over seven hundred pages bundle one alone shows with substantial corroboration that seventeen laws were broken in pursuit of a fine for sixty seconds. You won't believe the story, check here for updates.
A.AAAA...... B. A. Lit., B. A. Phil (Hons), Additional disciplines: Law, Logic, Psychology, Shakespeare, Music. Former MD, Clothing. OEM, IT manager, Application designer, Lecturer, Programmer (Unix,Csh,Basic,C,C+, Author of DBMS III, Menuix, Studies in Logic, Contextual Inferencing, and Special Fallacies of Conduct ). Primary Acknowledgements to; MMMMMM..... B. A. Lit., B. A. Phil (Hons), Additional interests: Music, Opera, Ballet, Drama, Etiquette & Fine Art, languages French, Romanian. AAAA. M.Sc . St. Pauls's Cathedral, M.Sc. Harrow, Piano (first instrument) , Organ, Violin, Singing. 1st Yr Prizewinner of Piano, Organ, Speech, Art, Headmaster's. 2nd year repeat on Music, 4th and 5th years unprecedented house wins 2 yrs running. B.Sc. Organ and Choral Scholar at St Barnabas Cathedral Nottingham also pianist. Violinist in the University Orchestra. Recording artist with JVC for Boy's Air Choir, Japan tour, and occasional guitarist with a band. Currently while doing services, has been offered a music directorship at several churches.
|
|||
|
Divergent and convergent thinking in legal drafting. 102 The principle here is excruciatingly simple. Universal and particulars. 102 Convergent thinking in legal tripping. Trapping arguments. 102 Divergent thinking resolves the subjectivity to objectivity. 106 Fluxing the thinking process. 107 Convergent rulings that are absurd as divergent precedents. 108 Daft drafting of statutes replete with nomological danglers for abuse. 110 How nomological danglers are abused, by several councils. 111 The forces of reaction where arguments meet the ambit of a tribunal. 113 Identifying the thrust behind equanimity in countenance. 114 Choreographed choosing of which CPR rules to uphold and which to hold up. 115 Two 'fair and public' hearings more like a pair of public leerings 116
|
Some faces of grave countenance in fallacious appeals to credent bulk, tenacious authority, salacious team leaders, voracious bleeders and mendacious predaceous target practicers. Written at varying levels of abstraction for the formally educated and the hard working public to know what is being done in 'Grate' v1, Britain today. Understanding; and where necessary resisting, everyday forms of persuasion designed to serve detriments on the individual. Seeing how the abuse of semantics in naming them benefits; to maintain a feel good factor, is totally unacceptable form of living an illusion that serves the interests of politics, power and money. It looks in to the heart of mendacity, and shows its form and features in the mirror of souls. It unravels the perversities perpetrated and purporting to be 'the will of parliament' by pettyfoggists who are accommodated with benign but grave faces who wrap the choreography of civil procedure rules to suit a design and purpose for revenue, that override the overriding objectives of fairness in CPR 1.1-4. Lots of amusing anecdotes accompany to see the lighter side of the darker forces of human nature. Some of the titles
of the index of chapters are left and right. An
ambiguity, in ordinary speech, means something very pronounced,
and as a rule witty and deceitful. I propose to use the word in
an extended sense, and shall think relevant to my subject any
consequence of language, however slight, which adds some nuance
to the direct statement of prose. (1930
W. Empson Seven Types of Ambiguity )
|
Getting at TRUTH, not necessarily winning. 126 The time honoured old fashion methodologies. 127 The polygraph reinforces those longstanding methods. 128 Brain fingerprinting and seeing thoughts, corroborate near certainties. 129 Acts show 'actus reus' in their traces 130 Omissions throw 'mens rea' into cohesion of the two faces. 131 Lingua lapsa verum dicit, undermines culpa lata. 132 Binding the two into the structure and dynamics of exchanges, and hearings. 134 Culpability is a function of anticipation and expectation. 136 The Mens Mentis of Praecelsus. 136 Culpability, 'mens rea', context, behaviour, conduct. |
|
|
|
|||
|
APOLOGIES for all typos and spelling errors, Mr. Saldanha is Portuguese. |
|||
|
Case two. (Top) Decriminalised parking YES! BUT Decriminalised for WHO, --- US? YES again. NOT for them. Might is RIGHT! EVEN when it's NOT, MIGHT has everything to do with morality, think about it!
_________________________________________________________________
These picture are from A London very very
proud, own parking 'solutions' department with a terrific code
of conduct saying they must follow principles of honesty,
sincerity, truth, not harass, act lawfully, and be open
to public scrutiny.
|
|||
|
ALSO
CAMDEN NEW JOURNAL REPORTS A STING
to get £TEN MILLION, £10,000,000 in
UNPAID parking fines. MOST
OF THESE ARE PROBABLY ILLEGAL,
on TWO issues ruled in the HIGH Court, PATAS, (top) PATAS
RULINGS AGAINST CAMDEN, and SOME of their VERY
ODD THINGS TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR? |
|||
|
17 Declaration
that item of account is unlawful (1) Where— http://www.logiclaw.co.uk
,
http://logiclaw.co.uk/LG/LGS.html
,
http://www.logiclaw.co.uk/lmag.html
,
http://www.logiclaw.co.uk/arg4dor/TemplateLetters.html
and
ALSO
Neil
Heron, the
link is on http://www.logiclaw.co.uk/Neil%20Heron.html
these
people are helping me for something FAR WORSE, Camden wants
nearly TWO thousand pounds from me for a NON contravention, that
is how far they will go to break the law on 'decriminalised'
parking
enforcement, who is being the criminal is the question?
Fawlty Towers; guest. “this
is the worst run hotel in the world!” Faulty
Powers. Uninformed motorist. In my country, it is said
“Portugal has the worst system of
justice in the world” |
|||
|
THIS IS THEIR NON CONTRAVENTION PICTURE the council can't fathom the warden gave illegally! |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 As at today, the CEO of Camden was served by fax, with a ten page letter, stipulating that, the entire sequence of letters are coming here, and will also be given to another web site for publication. This case has not been treated with proper fairness by the courts under the EU Human Rights Act, and PATAS, all exchanges between us have been carefully logged and prepared for publishing. In this area of Human Rights, it is not unreasonable to say Britain is leading in honouring Human Rights in their breach rather than in their preach. (It has been said. Totally “without prejudice”). Do you have a similar story of such third world atrocities that don't happen here? We have quite a few already. Are you ready?
First we MUST begin with the Camden
Council Code of Conduct. The FLAG of Justice, oops! The Justice
that flags. Camden Council - Code of Conduct
1
Introduction conduct that incorporates the provisions of The Model Code Of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW. Councillors, members of staff of council and delegates of the
council
must
comply with
the applicable provisions of council’s code of conduct.
the code and regularly review their personal circumstances with this in mind. Council contractors and volunteers will also be required to observe the relevant
provisions
of council’s code of conduct. of conduct constitutes misbehaviour. Failure by a member of staff to comply with
council’s
code of conduct may give rise to disciplinary
action.
4.1
Selflessness Full text below, pdf file here, or same council pdf file url direct link here. |
|||
|
_________________Wonderful things to think of while I am going to pay in their shop for something I didn't do?________________________ THEY ACTUALLY WANT ME TO BELIEVE A FALSEHOOD. |
|||
|
INDEX. (top) |
|||
|
_________________(Top)_____________________ |
|||
THIS IS THEIR NON CONTRAVENTION PICTURE the council can't fathom the warden gave illegally! |
|||
|
Check this line for updates. This will be fully publicised for every aspect of malfeasance that is continuing. (top)
THIS
IS THEIR NON
CONTRAVENTION
PICTURE the council can't fathom the warden gave
illegally! The PCN was 'AWARDED' to the obscured green
car left, bike next, white next, blue next. Arrows added to
Council's originals. The contravention NEVER OCCURRED! THE PCN was issued ILLEGALLY, is that clear? Nearly TWO YEARS later still pursuing, with PATAS, TEC and the County Court ALL AWARE, that's what's called FAIR! 5.2 You must act lawfully, honestly and exercise a reasonable degree of care and diligence... (Top) |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Initial Context. (top) PCN awards with invitations to pay and smile. So many wonderful opportunities to pay, the word pay is repeated about 16 times in the PCN paperwork. On
26th September 2005, Edward was 'awarded';
(YES that's what they wrote, and it will be shown) a PCN. He
appealed it in writing, stating one important fact. “The
contravention never took place.”
Edward knows he purchased a pay & display ticket, parked
in a pay & display bay, and the council's photos show it..
Truth? We mustn't be uncouth! They have 5 centres called SHOPS so that when you come to pay, you get the mixed up feeling you are shopping. All this is to palliate punishment, and enhance the feel good factor. It also says on the reverse, that if you want to make a representation, you can WRITE to them. It doesn't say they will reply, and to corroborate this, he made a complaint about bailiff action and unlawful visits in mid February 2007 and to date, he has yet to receive the courtesy of a reply. The council says clearly and repeatedly they try to reply to all letters within TEN days, If they could only reply before he receives his pension. (I wonder what the feel good factor makes him feel like doing at this stage?) (Top) |
|
THIS IS THEIR LOCATION
PICTURE |
THIS IS THEIR BAY
BOUNDARY PICTURE |
|
|
VEHICLE
ENQUIRY Services Provided By DVLA: |
||
|
“2.14. On 26 September 2005, Parking Services issued a Penalty Charge Notice to a vehicle registration no Y476KHT parked in a resident's parking space without clearly displaying a valid residents permit. This is PCN reference CD68598954.” |
What's wrong on the PCN when compared to the
picture. |
“2.14. On 26 September 2005, Parking Services issued a Penalty Charge Notice to a vehicle registration no Y476KHT parked in a pay and display space clearly displaying a valid, paid for, pay and display permit. This is PCN reference CD68598954.” |
|
GREEN is Blue or WHITE, SIX is TWELVE, LEFT is RIGHT, and most importantly MIGHT is RIGHT. Yes! Even when wrong! That's how government and judicial bodies see things today, or prefer where possible to not see things at all. |
|
|
|
|
The warden craftily took the picture showing two cars that were NOT the defendant's, where his is almost off the edge to the left. On the basis of this, the council were content to compromise themselves, every juridical body they cam in contact with, and pursue the money right through PATAS, TEC and the Court in a farce. Having made a short study of the best of British Justice, I can; to use the legal term 'reasonable', be satisfied that reason is banished for inequality, truth is exiled for equivocation, and blisters sit on the face of morality. THE ITV program Warden's Confessions shows wardens confessing to how they take these specially angulated and strangulated photographs to distort focus, play hocus pocus, and feed like locusts. I have the dvd.
The pictures should engage your attention that the contravention NEVER TOOK PLACE, and authority in denial remained blinkered and unconscionable throughout making their decisions based on selective and biased evidence, ignoring facts because they were inconvenient to look at squarely. The farce extends to some 30 pages of exhibits and 30 pages of argument, supported by a further 164 pages, that were 'disproportionate' to a single PCN that was the subject of malfeasance, fraud and abuse of authority. All will be forthcoming to show you precisely how AUTHORITY has a kind of medicine in itself that skins the vice off their conduct, and palliates the entire system of plunder into that of procedural defects and administration errors called 'AWARDS'.
The evidence nobody wanted to examine, because rules were preferred to truth.
Exhibit 1. The ACTUAL evidence from the council that the contravention did NOT OCCUR.
The warden had to be
between the white car left and the green car almost off picture right
beside the signs dividing the two pays.
Left is 'pay and display'
“right is resident's bay'.
The case material,
PATAS, TEC, Bailiffs after £757.94 and Court are coming
shortly.
The Local Council is now the Local Authority.
The
Police Complaint Authority, renamed Independent Police Complaints
Commission.
Local Government Ombudsman renamed Public Service
Ombudsman.
The Department of
Constitutional Affairs has been renamed Ministry of Justice.
'That
which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.'
'That
which we call a gloze by any other name would smell deceit.'
Comment
by Judiciary, the paperwork produced, was disproportionate.
NO
comment on whether the £757.94 was disproportionate for a non
contravention?
NO certainly not that wouldn't be winsome, do you
see the pure consistency in sound reasoning? (Top)
|
Before
looking at the PATAS decision. During exchanges the council
improved on their SPIN. The standard emphasis, promoted is that;
UNLIKE the Bill of Rights 1688, where the term used is FINE and
FORFEITURE, today's detriments are called CIVIL PENALTY and
DISTRAINT. ALL these terms belong to the SAME class of detriments
in the divide between detriments and benefits. The emphasis on
the modern terminology promotes the distinction that a FINE of
£100 is substantially different from a CIVIL PENALTY of
£100, and a FORFEITURE of £390.24 is so different
from a DISTRAINT of £390.24 as to make a material
difference to the recipient and make him so much happier when
calling his punishment by a different name. It all contributes to
the FEEL GOOD factor that is promoted when people are totally
dissatisfied for sound reasons. In order to further emphasise
this distinction and promote the idea that there is now a
competition to get PCNs and they are really something one even
hangs on the wall with pride, this council calls it an “AWARD”.
Doubts? Look at their letter. (top) Their omniscience tells me what I believe! When I KNOW the contrary is TRUE, AND enforce what THEY BELIEVE, to PURSUE, SUE and ACCRUE. They have a
lovely method, of subtracting while purporting. Yes that's what
their legal team concocted as an argument, in SHORT, everything
must PURPORT, in order to DISTORT, EXHORT and EXTORT. I just love the way they explain the rules of parking in a resident's bay, when I am simply NOT interested. NOBODY wants to LOOK AT THEIR photographs PROVING IT IS FALSE. NOT PATAS, NOT TEC, CERTAINLY NOT the COURT in THREE hearings. I wonder WHEN anyone will look at their own pictures. JUST WAIT to read what happened to them!!!!!! “YOU BELIEVE!” They even know what I believe, and what I believe I ate for breakfast! I don't know any more, AMAZING powers of knowledge! The warden SAW what he was instructed to see through glasses with the GREEN FILTER of BANKNOTES, INCENTIVES, BONUSES and TARGETS – OOPS, sorry they are NOT targets, THEY ARE 'BASELINE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS'. The latest name............... for targets. NEVER MIND THAT, I suppose, at least PATAS can be relied on to use their better judgement of the evidence. Edward had filed his NOTICE to OWNER, dated
26/10/05, ticking the box where it states, “the
contravention DID NOT take place”. That should be what one
does when parking and paying for a legal pay and display space.
The council forwarded the correspondence to PATAS, and included
the photographs. Edward runs a 6-7 day week dry cleaners, and
he could not close the shop and spend his time at PATAS, so he
made a representation BY POST. (Top) |
|
They dismissed his appeal, but how do YOU think they WORDED the reply? Perhaps it is better to say here, how do you think they CRAFTED the reply? You have seen the evidence, how might you dismiss an appeal, perhaps being informed or knowing the respondent is foreign, by simply reading his handwritten letter? A few comments would be nice here on the forum, to show exactly how you can make it appear that green is white, six is twelve, left is right and might is right. How might you, in all bad faith, looking at the WHOLE truth, and not simply truth and nothing but, which is so much more profitable? In about 2002/3 it was said Truth, the Whole truth and |
|
So here is the judgement, note it is NICELY balanced evenly. Then look at the expose below it. BASED ON THE WRITTEN EVIDENCE. SO next time you take a picture of a contravention, and distort the PCN, just read the MENU of evidence that YIELDS the REVENUE, no matter how ingenious.
HERE IS THE disambiguation showing EXACTLY HOW BIAS, sorry PATIAS, crafted and managed their replie to the appellant, sorry victim. Re read the ruling that's a fooling, for a foreigner, like Edward.
Look again at the ruling above here. The beginning of a section of pages showing rulings in courts, sorry caughts, that follow the dictates of FANCY, appetite, perhaps personal dislike, and especially where the forces of reaction, know WHAT THAT IS? Decides stealth tax revenue must be protected because it's the will of parliament, despite and no matter how, unlawfulness. Nice one, remember this, the bribe, sorry tribe-unals never make mistakes, if they do, then they bury their heads, or yours.
Then add to that the FACT; (FACTS? what are they?) that parking appeals, Neil Herron, and lmag took photos of the lines of the bays, and stated that they're were NOT compliant. SO EITHER WAY he was totally INNOCENT, and we all stand by smiling at it, so long as it's not US eh?
So the technique used wilfully in this case was the age old art in casuistry and sophistry, of
Classic fallacies; false arguments that are UNTENABLE, of the SIMPLE kind, that get far worse.
The reader(s) would be invited to controvert IF they both have the wit, and ability to do so. Otherwise the conclusions are likely to be
THESE adjudicators may be seen as agitprops to hidden wider and more powerful forces, that are deplorable in their conduct from ONE human being to another, from an elected council let alone from a backing adjudicator. They are as conduct of bad faith to good faith, from evil towards good, IF the reader so understands it.
“Once one breaks down such arguments to propositions IE; to truth and falsities, when the falsities GLOW in the dark they are horrendous to behold, and may cause extreme emotions to arise. These people are playing with fires they think they know how to control by wrapping falsities in neuro linguistic semantics. This not only provides a major problem, and costs, for the mental health of the public at large, many who lack the skills in this area to disambiguate, but also it builds resentment the like of which is unimaginable for a future consequence where no matter how much palliation is thrown at the fire, the indignities that arise, provide the basis of the kind of behaviour patterns such as a complete breakdown in civil obedience, to put it mildly, as the only method left yet to treat such bitter pills wrapped in sweet papers.” This is the beginning only of the judgement that a reasoned decision maker, and law maker would or should reach. A separate url is coming here, to show fallacies of reasoning, AND conduct from Judicial bodies. “Justice is NOT itself that oft looks so, in just ice is still the nurse of second woe” FIVE fallacies in one single bundle. Wrapped in equality to present it as fair sorry fare, like a news programme nicely balanced, but SELECTED for its balance. That's Justice for those who dare to speak against errant peccant councils. Clever
little semantic children? How justice looks nowadays, a little blind and the scales a bit wonky, with a sword to make you see their POINT.
Well next time you hear there is a government
or judicial review watch out for the words....... |
|
Parking Penalties “OOPS! Just consider and serve a rejection, forget about a decision, forget about discretion or doubt TRUTH IS OUT. What a breath of fresh air, when we have a rare flair to scare and be unfair. Such schadenfreude to be enjoyed wile I am annoyed and destroyed.” SO long as they keep DESCRIBING the water, I am drowning in, its so much more fun.” Charge certificates, for more on this click
here. THIS NEEDS SERIOUS CONSIDERATION, It's
precisely where the FIRST duty is open to dereliction. To put this in perspective, there is a small
range of disjunctive propositions that follow from the 'duty to
serve' the Charge Certificate (CC), so where a CC is 'issued at'
or 'issued to', and falls accidentally in
conformity with purpose and design, into the bin, a range of
possibilities follow where non payment, non response or time out,
in reply is used to carry on enforcement without the procedure
making contact with a judicial body. Not that this contact is
reliable either, as has just been shown with PATAS. Bear in mind
that the composition, accountability and statistical balance will
show clearly the preponderance of conduct in favour or against
using discretion to balance the scales of justice. If you wish to
go further into the factors affecting composition, discretion and
justice then have a look at the Local Government Ombudsman, NOW
the Public Sector Ombudsman exposed
here, and also
here. If you wish to balance probabilities here, you will see as we traverse, that he IS a person to make a representation when he has knowledge and receipt of the relevant forms that allow him to do so. What happens next? After a period of time, the Charge Certificate being unpaid, for perfectly sound reasons, will get sent to the TEC, and this is the next point of contact with a judicial body. At that stage, the same if not worse situation is awaiting Edward. He doesn't even know about this procedure, and
little understands the need to file in time or out of time a
statutory declaration saying something is wrong. The council has
a global statement of truth, that covers a bulk procedure of
registrations, and this assumes that each time a CC is registered
as a debt, it relies on the 'truth' of being at least valid,
having had a CC properly served, and not 'issued at', and 'for a
contravention that occurred'. Proper service at each stage of the
procedure is critical, otherwise the nice term comes into play
that there was an administration error or procedural defect.
That's the council's term for their errors, but forget such terms
when it's the motorist, for him the contravention occurred and he
is enforced to pay. NOBODY gets blamed from the council. They
have a code of conduct that arises from the Local Government Act
2003, and it really looks impressive IF it were adhered to. They
waive it at you, to show they have it, but don't' demonstrate
in conduct, they use or adhere to it. Forget asking the council
to PROVE service, they are believed because they are never wrong,
not even by .001 percent. If they are cornered, their best is
something like “we accept you did do X and therefore have
cancelled the Y. Apologising implies culpability and
accountability, meaning money. Money is a one way street for
most. Edward's appeal was dismissed. Is he to know
that he could appeal against the decision? It's not stated on the
dismissal form? He is confused, busy trying to earn his living,
and moving on. Perhaps if a fuss is made, some 6 month's later he
can get a nice pamphlet saying “what happens next?”
that commences to 'frame' the procedure he is to take in 'venting
his fury' quietly in the backyard. Meantime On August 2nd 2006, in the HIGH COURT here, Justice Jackson rules that a Penalty Charge Notice ( PCN ), without TWO dates is an unenforceable nullity. It cannot trigger any enforcement at any stage after its issue. Councils are all watching this with grave concern and within a short time after they change their PCN formulations to show TWO dates. On 14th August 2006 The ALG, advises all London boroughs to ensure their PCNs, comply AND to stop enforcing non complaint ones. That letter is here. Edward hasn't a clue about it. The council does. Councils take a decision, some STOP enforcing, some make it public, most keep it quiet, like Islington, and others shelve the advice. This council has; among others, two people in procedure, Mr. W. and Saldanha. Mr. W. is watching and studying procedure meticulously, and Edward is pressing his clothes. Mr. W. ( who got a 60 second PCN in April 2006, becomes involved with Robin DeCrittenden, Wayne Pendle, Neil Heron and the Directors of LMAG ), he innocently dared to challenge the two date issue himself, gets served with a CC without having his appeal, denying his HUMAN RIGHTS, and Edward is moving unseen but parallel towards enforcement of 'unenforceable nullities'. Behind the scenes PATAS, the ALG are all watching on closely, and each borough is making their choices neither condoning nor sanctioning.
The above, new pictures and text are being added, so when re-visiting do have a check over text already read, as terms refer to websites, and links that need to be added, and have been 'in situ' for some time, anticipating this build up, and sub judice traversals that are at present in temporary abatement. (Top) |
|
Next we shall look at the TEC procedure and the Global Statement of truth. (top) Here is the global Truth statement,
On Wed Feb 7 10:53 , 'CCBC Customer Service, Tec' <Customerservice.tec@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk> sent:
Dear Mr Saldanha
Thank you for your email.
You will not need to get the N244 form witnessed. When requesting issue of Warrants of Execution the local authority's declaration is a Global Certificate, this certifies that:
· 21 days have elapsed since service of the registration order; · fully payment has not been received; · no statutory declaration has been filed; · no time extension has been approved; and · the respondent lives in England and Wales.
Kind Regards
Here is the CPR 75.3
75.3 (1) The authority must file a request in the appropriate form scheduling the amount claimed to be due. (2) The authority must, in that request or in another manner approved by the court officer (a) certify – (i) that 14 days have elapsed since service of the notice of the amount due; (ii) the date of such service; (iii) the number of the notice of the amount due; and (iv) that the amount due remains unpaid; (b) specify the grounds (whether by reference to the appropriate code or otherwise), as stated in the notice, on which the authority claims to be entitled to claim that amount; and (c) state – (i) the name, title and address of the respondent; (ii) the registration number of the vehicle concerned; (iii) the authority's address for service; (iv) the court fee; and (v) such other matters as required by the practice direction. (3) On receipt of a request that meets the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2), the court officer will order that the amount due may be recovered as if it were payable under a county court order by sealing the request and returning it to the authority. (4) On receipt of a sealed request the authority may draw up an order and must attach to it a form of statutory declaration for the respondent's use. (5) Within 14 days of receipt of the sealed request, the authority must serve the order (and the form of statutory declaration) on the respondent in accordance with Part 6.
|
|
The Out of Time statutory Declaration first time around for another PCN. (top) The reasons given are here below, this PCN had been paid up to £100 and bailiff action was pending. (1) The CD or parking ticket / penalty charge notice is non compliant with statute, Road Traffic Act 1991, Section 66 (3), (c), (d).... and has several rulings against its format. ie; Al's Bar -v- London Borough of Wandsworth, Moulder -v- London Borough of Sutton AND Barnet V Moses 2nd August 2006 in Front of Mr. Justice Jackson.
(2) The notice of rejection is non compliant with statute, Road Traffic Act 1991, The Notice to Owner (NtO) does not conform to paragraph 1(2)(c) of Schedule 6 which
I refer this to the following case National Parking Adjudication Service Case No: AY 05003B Adjudicator’s Decision, Mrs Deepa Lukha and Aylesbury Vale District Council
(3) Documentation is addressed to Mr. Dry Cleaner. There is no such person at this address... (4) The bailiff appears to not be certified with the HMCS but this will be confirmed at a later date, as to where the certification is listed... (5) The allegation of one wheel being slightly over the bay line is unproven. I am not very good at speaking English, and do not understand the law very well. I have taken advice, and on learning that the CD ticket, notice of rejection and name of addressee are all non compliant with the law.
HERE WAS THE RESPONSE
From: "CCBC Customer Service, Tec" <Customerservice.tec@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk> To: "'M.” tinternet.com> Subject: RE: Statutory declaration PE3 & PE2 ---- Ref CD 1442 50? ? Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 08:50:38 -0000 Good morning,
I can now confirm that the local authority did not object to your application to file a Statutory Declaration. The Court Registration was therefore cancelled yesterday and you will receive a copy of the order in the next few days.
Please note that this does not cancel the original charge, the local authority may still wish to pursue.
Regards
Helena Parker The Out of Time statutory Declaration SECOND time around for the present PCN. (1) The CD or parking ticket / penalty charge notice is non compliant with statute, Road Traffic Act 1991, Section 66 (3), (c), (d).... and has several rulings against its format. ie; Al's Bar -v- London Borough of Wandsworth, Moulder -v- London Borough of Sutton AND Barnet V Moses 2nd August 2006 in Front of Mr. Justice Jackson.
throughout that period of time. The other may be used as evidence if required. The Notice to Owner (NtO) does not conform to paragraph 1(2)(c) of Schedule 6 which
I refer this to the following case National Parking Adjudication Service Case No: AY 05003B Adjudicator’s Decision, Mrs Deepa Lukha and Aylesbury Vale District Council
(3) I paid the council £100 in the first instance.
I am not very good at speaking English, and do not understand the law very well. I have taken advice, and on learning that the CD ticket, notice of rejection and name of addressee are all non compliant with the law.
From: 'CCBC Customer Service, Tec' <Customerservice.tec@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk> Sent: Tue Jan 30 14:12 To: ''saldanha@'' <saldanha> ... Priority: Normal Dear Mr Saldanha
Thank you for your comments.
The warrant was issued on 07/11/06 and your out of time application was filed on 10/01/07. Any bailiff action should be on hold from that date.
Kind regards
Amanda Beck
From: 'CCBC Customer Service, Tec' <Customerservice.tec@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk> Sent: Thu Feb 15 15:26
To: ''saldanha'' <saldanha> ... Priority: Normal
Subject: RE: Please find enclosed attachments as detailed in previous
Good afternoon,
Thank you for your email the contents of which have been noted.
I would like to confirm that the application to file a Statutory Declaration 'out of time' on CD 144250?? was processed on 31st October 2006. As the local authority did not submit their opposition to the application, the Court Registration was revoked on 28th November 2006. There should be no further enforcement action on this case at this stage.
With regards to CD 300802?? the application to file a Statutory Declaration 'out of time' was filed on 10th January 2007. The local authority submitted their opposition to this application and so it will be referred to a Court Officer to make an impartial decision on 19th February 2007.
I would like to confirm that as soon as an application to file a Statutory Declaration 'out of time' is filed, the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) informs the local authority in order for them to suspend further bailiff action pending the appeal. If the Court Officer grants the application then the Court Registration is revoked and so enforcement action is also cancelled. If however the Court Officer refuses the application, both parties are notified by post. The local authority may recommence enforcement action once they receive the Court Officer's Order.
I am afraid that the TEC cannot request that the local authority maintains the suspension of enforcement once the Court Officer refuses an application until a valid 'N244 Application Notice' is filed in order to set aside the Court Officer's decision.
{ IMPORTANT NOTE: if the council rejects your Out of Time Statutory Declaration, It is important to monitor this over the days between their decision and when you file ANOTHER N244 Statutory Declaration to have that decision along with that of the TEC Court Officer's decision be SET ASIDE and to be transferred to the local county court. }
If you wish to make a complaint regarding the details of the original contravention or regarding any correspondence entered into with the local authority, this must be made directly to the local authority. The TEC does not hold any jurisdiction over their actions prior to Court Registration.
If you wish to make a complaint about the bailiffs again you must contact the local authority or the bailiff company directly. The bailiffs in this case are private certified bailiffs employed by the local authority and so the TEC cannot deal with complaints of this nature. I note you have already completed a complaints form. You will need to send it to the Court where the bailiff obtained their certificate (this is not the TEC).
I have attached a copy of all your correspondence to your file so that it will be available to the Court Officer when a decision is made. You will be notified of the result once it has been made.
If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact us.
Regards Helena Parker
{ NOTE: Remember since 2nd August 2006 High Court ruling, this PCN was an 'unenforceable nullity', AND the ALG letter advised all councils to STOP enforcing these PCNs. HERE WE ARE in 2007 enforcing them, ALONG with the fact the contravention did not occur !!!!!!!!!
FASCINATING HOW law abiding councils, with a 20 page code of conduct on truth, integrity, transparency, and open to public scrutiny, pursue revenue that's TWOFOLD unlawful and awful, is it not? }
One bailiff visit and three bailiff letters and no reply to the complaint made mid Feb 2007 with a ten day code of conduct in response time.
So if that's not all a nice bit of fun for Mr. Saldanha, being hounded out of business for something he didn't do, then here is where the real fun begins.
We are now going to look at the face of moral integrity and observe JUSTICE in a BRITISH COURT. GREAT BRITAIN. The question is where is the essence to the first word?
The first hearing at court for 30 minutes was set down for a full day that has taken place. The issue there, was resolved adversely for Saldanha, and things may have to go sub judice for a few days. (Top) |
|
In exchanges we asked for more information and received this. (top) THE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT CENTRE (TEC) FACT SHEET. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (formally the Parking Enforcement Centre) was established to put into effect procedures, for dealing with unpaid parking fines, bus lane contravention’s, vehicle emission penalties, Congestion Charging and Moving Contravention’s. The TEC is based at the County Court Bulk Centre and operates as apart of Northampton County Court. What happens before the penalty charge/fixed penalty is registered? The following stages occur before the charge is registered with TEC in the case of parking and bus lane penalties: 1.A Penalty Charge Notice would have been issued. This should have been paid or appealed against as per instructions given on the notice. 2.A Notice to Owner/Enforcement Notice/Penalty Charge Notice would have been sent to the registered keeper of the vehicle (not necessarily the driver at the time of the offence). This amount should have been paid or disputed. Representations should have been made in writing to the Local Authority and, if appropriate, an appeal made to the Parking/Traffic Adjudicator. 3.A Charge Certificate would have been issued 28 days after the penalty charge notice. The penalty charge is increased by 50%. This should have been paid to the Local Authority. In the case of vehicle emissions, only a Fixed Penalty Notice is issued to the vehicle driver. This should have been paid or a hearing into the offence requested. If no action is taken after 28 days, the penalty will increase. If the penalty charge/fixed penalty notice still remains unpaid after a further 14 days, the Local Authority may register it with the TEC to recover the outstanding amount under a county court order. What should I do if I have already paid the penalty charge/fixed penalty? You must contact the Local Authority with your proof of payment. If you do nothing the Local Authority may attempt to recover the penalty charge/fixed penalty. What should I do if I wish to contest the charge? At this stage for parking and bus lane contravention’s there are only three grounds under which the charge may be contested: 1.The Notice to Owner/Enforcement Notice/Penalty Charge Notice was not received. 2.Formal representations against the Notice to Owner/Enforcement Notice/Penalty Charge Notice have been made to the Local Authority within 28 days of the service of the notice to owner/Enforcement Notice/Penalty Charge Notice but a rejection notice has not been received. 3.An appeal has been made to the Parking/Traffic Adjudicator against the Local Authority’s decision to reject the representation within 28 days of the service of the rejection notice but no response has been received. In the case of vehicle emissions only two grounds are permissible: 1.The Fixed Penalty Notice has not been received. 2.A request for the variation of the Fixed Penalty has been made to the authority pursuant to Regulation 19 of the Road Traffic (Vehicle Emissions) (Fixed Penalty) (England) Regulations 2002, but you did not receive notification that the Fixed Penalty had been reduced or (as the case may be) that your request had been refused nor of the amount that was payable. If any of these apply you should file a Statutory Declaration with TEC within 21 days from the date of the Order of Recovery. If your Penalty Charge is a London Borough Parking Offence only one ground for appeal can be indicated and the witness must provide a full postal address. If you wish to challenge the charge for any other reason for example, you simply disagree with the rejection of your representation you should not make a Statutory Declaration but should contact the Local Authority directly. Where can my Statutory Declaration be sworn? Your Statutory Declaration must be witnessed (sworn) by any of the following before it can be accepted by the TEC: 1.An officer appointed by the Judge to take affidavits. These can be found at your Local County Court. No fee is payable for this service. 2.A Justice of the Peace at any Magistrates Court. You may have to pay a fee and should contact your Local Magistrates Court for further information. 3.A Solicitor or Commissioner for Oaths. You may have to pay a fee and should contact the Solicitors office for details. What happens if I file a valid Statutory Declaration? TEC will revoke the Order for Recovery. This does not mean that the penalty charge/fixed penalty has been cancelled. The Local Authority may continue the process; they will contact you if they intend to take any further action. What happens if I do not respond? If you do not file a valid Statutory Declaration with TEC within 21 days of the date of the Order for Recovery, the Local Authority may enforce the charge by requesting a warrant. When the warrant has been authorised by TEC, the Local Authority will employ certificated bailiffs to execute the warrant. What should I do if the Bailiff has been instructed and I wish to appeal? Provided a Statutory Declaration can be filed under one or more of the grounds and there was a good reason why the Statutory Declaration was not filed earlier (within the 21 day time limit), you should contact the TEC on 08457 045007 to request a Late Statutory Declaration. This should be sent to the TEC and not the Local Authority. Who do I pay? You must send any payment direct to the Local Authority. Any payments received by TEC will be returned. If you have any queries regarding payment arrangements you must contact the Local Authority. How do I find out if a warrant has been issued? You may contact the Local Authority or TEC to find out if a warrant has been issued. (If you contact TEC you must quote the penalty charge/fixed penalty notice number. TEC is unable to trace your case without it). Who do I contact regarding Bailiff action? As the Local Authority employs the bailiffs, any queries must be addressed to the bailiffs or the Local Authority. TEC cannot suspend or cancel any bailiff action. Any complaints about the conduct of a bailiff must be made to the county court that issued the certificate for the bailiff and not the TEC. Will the charge be registered as a judgement? Although the charge is registered in the county court, the information is not held on the Register of County Court Judgements. Further advice TEC staff cannot give you advice on points of law, but can send you form’s and give you information about TEC procedures. When corresponding with TEC please ensure that the penalty charge/fixed penalty notice number is quoted in full. (Top) |
|
Page No 1 (Top) Original Council pdf file here, CODE OF CONDUCT Adopted by Council 29 th March,2005. Top Page No 2 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introductions 3 2 Definitions 4 3 Purpose of the code of conduct 5 4 Key Principles 7 5 General Conduct Obligations 8 6 Conflicts of Interest 10 7 Personal Benefit 13 8 Relationship between Council Officials 15 9 Access to information and council resources 17 10 Reporting breaches, complaint handling procedures & sanctions 20 11 Councillor misbehaviour 22 Page No 3 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 3 1 Introduction The Local Government Act 1993 requires every council to adopt a code of conduct that incorporates the provisions of The Model Code Of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW. Councillors, members of staff of council and delegates of the council must comply with the applicable provisions of council’s code of conduct. It is the personal responsibilit y of council officials to comply with the standards in the code and regularly review their personal circumstances with this in mind. Council contractors and volunteers will also be required to observe the relevant provisions of council’s code of conduct. Failure by a councillor to comply with an applicable requirement of council’s code of conduct constitutes misbehaviour. Failure by a member of staff to comply with council’s code of conduct may give rise to disciplinary action. Page No 4 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 4 2 Definitions In the model code of conduct the following definitions apply: Council official Includes councillors, members of staff of council and delegates of council. Delegates of council A delegate of council is a person or body to whom a function of council is delegated Designated person See the definition in section 441 of the Local Government Act 1993 Act of disorder See the definition in clause 29 of the Local Government (Meetings) regulation 1999 The Act The Local Government Act 1993 The term “you” used in the model code of conduct refers to council officials. References to sections in the model code of conduct are references to sections in the Local Government Act 1993. Page No 5 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 5 3 Purpose of the code of conduct The Model Code of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW sets the minimum requirements of behaviour for council officials in carrying out their function. The model code is prescribed by regulation. The model code of conduct has been developed to assist council officials to: Understand the standards of conduct that are expected of them Enable them to fulfil their statutory duty to act honestly and exercise a reasonable degree of care and diligence (section 439) Act in a way that enhances public confidence in the integrity of local government. Page No 6 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 6 4 Key Principles The code of conduct applies equally to formal and informal dealings between councillors, staff and others. The general principles upon which codes must be based are: 4.1 Selflessness Council officials have a duty to make decisions solely in the public interest. Officials must not act in order to gain financial or other benefits for themselves, their family or friends. This means making decisions because they benefit the public, not because they benefit the decision maker. 4.2 Integrity Council officials must not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to any individual or organisation that might reasonably be thought to influence them in the performance of their duties. 4. 3 Objectivity Council officials must make decisions solely on merit and in accordance with their statutory obligations when carrying out public business. This includes the making of appointments, awarding of contracts or recommending individuals for rewards or benefits. This means fairness to all; impartial assessment; merit selection in Recruitment and in purchase and sale of council’s resources; considering only Relevant matters. 4.4 Accountability Council officials are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must consider issues on their merits, taking into account the views of others. This means recording reasons for decisions; submitting to scrutiny; keeping proper records; establishing audit trails. 4.5 Openness Council officials have a duty to be as open as possible about their decisions and Page No 7 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 7 actions, giving reasons for decisions and restricting information only when the wider public interest clearly demands. This means giving and revealing reasons for decisions; revealing other avenues available to the client or business; when authorised, offering all information; communicating clearly. 4.6 Honesty Council officials have a duty to act honestly. Officials must declare any private interests relating to they’re public duties and take steps to resolve any conflicts arising in such a way that protects the public interest. This means obeying the law; following the letter and spirit of policies and procedures; observing codes of conduct; fully disclosing actual or potential conflict of interests and exercising any conferred power strictly for the purpose for which the power was conferred. 4.7 Leadership Council officials have a duty to promote and support these principles by leadership and example and to maintain and strengthen the public’s trust and confidence in the integrity of the council. This means promoting public duty to others in the council and outside, by their own ethical behaviour. 4.8 Respect Council officials must treat with respect other council officials and the role they play, treating them with courtesy at all times. Page No 8 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 8 5 General Conduct Obligations General conduct 5.1 You have an obligation to comply with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993, the associated regulations and council’s policies. 5.2 You must act lawfully, honestly and exercise a reasonable degree of care and diligence in carrying out your functions under the Local Government Act 1993 or any other Act. (section 439 of the Local Government Act 1993) 5.3 You must respect all community members and other council officials and the role they play, treating them with courtesy at all times. 5.4 Councillors must avoid behaviour that could be deemed to be an act of disorder or misbehaviour. This includes conduct that: Contravenes the Local Government Act 1993 or associated regulations Is detrimental to the pursuit of the charter of a Council; Is improper or unethical; Is an abuse of power or otherwise amounts to misconduct; Causes, comprises or involves intimidation, harassment or verbal abuse; Causes, comprises or involves discrimination, disadvantage or adverse treatment in relation to employment; Causes, comprises or involves prejudice in the provision of a service to the Community; Causes, comprises or involves improperly directing or influencing or attempting to direct or influence a member of the staff of the Council or a delegate of the Council in the exercise of the functions of the member or delegate. Fairness and equity 5.5 You have an obligation to consider issues consistently, promptly and fairly. This involves dealing with matters in accordance with established procedures, in a non-discriminatory manner. 5.6 You must take all relevant facts known to you, or that you should be reasonably aware of, into consideration and have regard to the particular merits of each case. You must not take irrelevant matters or circumstances into consideration when making decisions. Page No 9 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 9 Harassment and discrimination 5.7 You must not harass, discriminate, or support others who harass and discriminate against colleagues or members of the public on the grounds of sex, pregnancy, age, race (including their colour, nationality, descent, ethnic or religious background), political affiliation, marital status, disability, homosexuality or transgender. Guide to ethical decision-making 5.8 If you are unsure about the ethical issues around an action or decision you are about to take, you should consider these five points: Is the decision or conduct lawful? Is the decision or conduct consistent with Council’s policy and with Council’s objectives and the Code of Conduct? What will the outcome be for the employee or councillor, work colleagues, the Council and any other parties? Do these outcomes raise a conflict of interest or lead to private gain at public expense? Can the decision or conduct be justified in terms of the public interest and would it withstand public scrutiny? Remember – you have the right to question any instruction or direction given to you which you think may be unethical or unlawful. If you are uncertain about an action or decision, you may need to seek advice from other people. This includes your supervisor or trusted senior officer, the Department of Local Government, the Ombudsman’s Office and the Independent Commission Against Corruption. Independent Commission Against Corruption 8281 5999 NSW Ombudsman 9286 1000 NSW Department of Local Government 4428 4100 Page No 10 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 10 6 Conflict of Interest Pecuniary and non-pecuniary conflict of interests 6.1 A conflict of interests exists when you could be influenced, or a reasonable person would perceive that you could be influenced by a personal interest when carrying out your public duty. 6.2 You must appropriately resolve any conflict or incompatibility between your private or personal interests and the impartial performance of your public or professional duties. 6.3 Any conflict between your interests and those of council must be resolved to the satisfaction of the council. When considering whether or not you have a conflict of interests, it is always important to think about how others would view your situation. 6.4 It is essential that you properly address conflict of interest’s issues that may arise. You must: Try to understand the concept and practical implications of conflict of interests issues Accept that failure to resolve an actual or reasonably perceived conflict of interests is unacceptable in local government Take timely and appropriate action to avoid, or if not, to disclose any actual, potential or reasonably perceived conflict of interests. 6.5 Perceptions of a conflict of interests are as important as actual conflict of interests. The onus is on you to identify a conflict of interests, whether perceived or real, and take the appropriate action to resolve the conflict in favour of your public duty. 6.6 Where necessary, you must disclose an interest promptly, fully and in writing. If a disclosure is made at a council or committee meeting, both the disclosure and nature of an interest must be recorded in the minutes. 6.7 If you are in doubt whether a conflict of interests exists, you should seek legal or other appropriate advice. Page No 11 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 11 6.8 A conflict of interests can be of two types: Pecuniary - An interest that a person has in a matter because of a reasonable likelihood or expectation of appreciable financial gain or loss to the person or another person with whom the person is associated. (sections 442, 443 of the Local Government Act 1993) Non-pecuniary - A private or personal interest the councillor, staff member or delegate has that does not amount to a pecuniary interest as defined in the Local Government Act 1993 (for example; a friendship, membership of an association, society or trade union or involvement or interest in an activity). 6.9 Where the interest is a pecuniary one, you must comply with the Act. If you do not comply with the Act, the consequences may be severe. The Act requires that if a pecuniary interest exists in a matter, you must not be involved in consideration or discussion of the matter in which you have the interest and must not participate in the decision-making process or vote on any question relating to the matter. The Act requires that: Councillors and designated persons lodge an initial and an annual written disclosure of interests that could potentially be in conflict with their public or professional duties (section 449 of the Local Government Act 1993); Councillors or members of council committees disclose an interest at a meeting, leave the meeting and be out of sight of the meeting and not participate in discussions or voting on the matter (section 451 of the Local Government Act 1993); Designated persons immediately declare, in writing, any pecuniary interest (Section 459 of the Local Government Act 1993). Designated persons are defined at Section 441 of the Local Government Act 1993. 6.10 Where the interest is a non-pecuniary one you have a broader range of options for managing the interest. The option you choose will depend on an assessment of the circumstances of the matter, the degree of the interest and the significance of the issue being dealt with. You must deal with a conflict of interests in at least one of these ways: Take no action because the potential for conflict is minimal. Council officials should consider providing an explanation of why they consider a conflict does not exist; Disclose the nature of the conflict; Limit involvement if practical (for example, participate in discussion but not in decision making) or restrict your access to all relevant information. Care needs to be taken when exercising this option; Remove the source of the conflict (for example, relinquishing or divesting the personal interest that creates the conflict or reallocating the conflicting Page No 12 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 12 duties to another officer); Have no involvement by absenting yourself from and not taking part in any debate or voting on the issue, particularly if you have a significant interest; Include an independent in the process to provide assurances of probity (for example, for tendering or recruitment selection panels). Other business or employment 6.11 A member of staff who is considering outside employment that relates to the business of the council or that might conflict with their council duties, must notify and seek the approval of the general manager in writing. (section 353 of the Local Government Act 1993) Political support 6.12 Councillors should note that matters before council for determination that involve campaign donors or supporters have the potential to place the councillor in a position of having a pecuniary or non-pecuniary conflict of interests. Personal dealings with council 6.13 You will inevitably deal personally with your council (for example, as a ratepayer, recipient of a council service or applicant for a consent granted by council). You must not expect or request preferential treatment for yourself or your family because of your position. You must avoid any action that could lead members of the public to believe that you are seeking preferential treatment. Page No 13 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 13 7 Personal Benefit Gifts or benefits 7.1 You must not: Seek or accept a bribe or other improper inducement; By virtue of your position acquire a personal profit or advantage which has a monetary value, other than one of a token value. 7.2 You must not seek or accept any payment, gift or benefit intended or likely to influence, or that could be reasonably perceived by an impartial observer as intended or likely to influence you to: act in a particular way (including making a particular decision); fail to act in a particular circumstance; otherwise deviate from the proper exercise of your official duties. 7.3 You may accept gifts or benefits of a nominal or token value and that do not create a sense of obligation on your part. Token gifts 7.4 Generally speaking, token gifts and moderate acts of hospitality could include: Gifts of single bottles of reasonably priced alcohol to individual Council officials at end of year functions, public occasions or in recognition of work done (such as providing a lecture/training session/address); Free or subsidised meals, of a modest nature, and/or beverages provided infrequently (and/or reciprocally) that have been arranged primarily for, or in connection with, the discussion of official business; Free meals, of a modest nature, and/or beverages provided to Council officials who formally represent their council at work related events such as training, education sessions, workshops; Refreshments, of a modest nature, provided at conferences where you are a speaker; Ties, scarves, coasters, tie pins, diaries, chocolates, flowers and small amounts of beverages; Invitations to appropriate out of hours “cocktail parties” or social functions organised by groups, such as, council committees and community organisations. Page No 14 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 14 Gifts of value 7.5 You must never accept an offer of money, regardless of the amount. 7.6 Gifts and benefits that have more than a nominal or token value include tickets to major sporting events, corporate hospitality at a corporate facility at a sporting venue, discounted products for personal use, the frequent use of facilities such as gyms, use of holiday homes, free or discounted travel and free training excursions. 7.7 If you receive a gift of more than token value in circumstances where it cannot reasonably be refused or returned, you should accept the gift and disclose this promptly to your supervisor or the general manager. The supervisor or general manager will ensure that any gifts received are recorded in a Gifts Register. 7.8 You must avoid situations in which the appearance may be created that any person or body, through the provision of hospitality or benefits of any kind, is securing or attempting to influence or secure a favour from you or the council. 7.9 You must also take all reasonable steps to ensure that your immediate family members do not receive gifts or benefits that could appear to an impartial observer to be an attempt to influence or secure a favour. Immediate family members ordinarily include parents, spouses, children and siblings. 7.10 Councillors and designated persons must by law disclose a description of any gift or gifts totalling a value exceeding $500 made by the same person during a period of 12 months or less. (required to be included in the disclosure of interests returns – section 449 of the Local Government Act 1993) Improper and undue influence 7.11 You must not take advantage of your position to improperly influence other council officials in the performance of their public or professional duties to secure a private benefit for yourself or for somebody else. 7.12 You must not take advantage (or seek to take advantage) of your status or position with, or functions performed for, council in order to obtain unauthorised or unfair benefit for yourself or for any other person or body. Page No 15 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 15 8 Relationship between Council Officials Obligations of councillors 8.1 Each council is a statutory corporat ion. The councillors are the governing body of the corporation. Councillors have the responsibility of directing and controlling the affairs of the council in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993. 8.2 Councillors must: Only provide, by way of council or committee resolution, or by the Mayor exercising their power under s226 of the Local Government Act 1993, proper and appropriate direction to the general manager in the performance of council’s functions; Refrain from, in any public or private forum, directing or improperly influencing, or attempting to direct or improperly influence, any other member of the staff of the council or a delegate of the council in the exercise of the functions of the member or delegate; Only contact a member of the staff of the Council in accordance with procedures governing the interaction of Councillors and Council staff that have been authorised by the General Manager; Not contact or issue instructions to any of Council’s contractors or tenderers, including Council’s legal advisers. Role of the Mayor 8.3 The role of the Mayor is defined by section 226 of the Local Government Act 1993. This role is the same whether the Mayor is popularly elected or elected by the Councillors. Obligations of staff 8.4 The General Manager is responsible for the efficient and effective operation of the council’s organisation and for ensuring the implementation of, without delay, the decisions of the Council. 8.5 Council staff have an obligation to: Give their attention to the business of council while on duty; Ensure that their work is carried out efficiently, economically and effectively; Page No 16 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 16 Carry out lawful directions given by any person having authority to give such Directions; Give effect to the lawful policies, decisions and practices of the council, whether or not the staff member agrees with or approves of them. Obligations during meetings 8.6 You must act in accordance with council’s Code of Meeting Practice and the Local Government (Meetings) Regulation 1999 during council and committee meetings. 8.7 You must respect the chair, other council officials and any members of the public present during council and committee meetings or other formal proceedings of the council. Inappropriate interactions 8.8 The following interactions are inappropriate: Councillors approaching junior members of staff for information on sensitive or controversial matters; Members of staff approaching councillors directly (rather than via their director, staff representative or union delegate) on staffing or political issues; Councillors approaching staff outside the council building or outside hours of work to discuss council business; Staff refusing to give information which is available to other Councillors to a particular Councillor because of the staff member’s or Councillor’s political views; Councillors who have a development application before council discussing the matter with junior staff in staff-only areas of the Council; Junior staff being asked to answer questions or provide documents to Councillors who are overbearing or threatening; Councillors directing or pressuring staff in the performance of their work, or recommendations they should make; Staff providing ad hoc advice to Councillors without recording or documenting the interaction as they would if the advice was provided to a member of the community; Councillors approaching Council staff organisations; for example unions and associations; in relation to staffing matters; Page No 17 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 17 9 Access to information and Council resources Councillor access to information 9.1 A Council must provide access to the documents listed in section 12 of the Local Government Act 1993 to all members of the public, and to Councillors. A council must also provide Councillors with information sufficient to enable them to carry out their civic functions. 9.2 Any information that is given to a particular councillor in the pursuit of their civic duties must also be available to any other Councillor who requests it. 9.3 Councillors who have a personal (as distinct from civic) interest in a document of council have the same rights of access as any member of the public. 9.4 Council staff have an obligation to provide full and timely information to councillors about matters that they are dealing with. 9.5 Councillors have an obligation to properly examine all the information provided to them relating to matters that they are dealing with, sufficient to make a decision on the matter in accordance with Council’s charter. Refusal of access to documents 9.6 The General Manager and Public Officer must act reasonably in deciding whether a document sought by a Councillor should be made available under section 12 of the Local Government Act 1993 or because it is relevant to the performance of the Councillor’s civic duty. The General Manager or Public Officer must state the reasons for the decision if access is refused. Use of Council information 9.7 Council officials must: Protect confidential information; Only access information needed for council business; Not use confidential information for any non-official purpose; Only release confidential information if you have authority to do so.; Only use confidential information for the purpose it is intended to be used; Only release other information in accordance with established Council policies and procedures and in compliance with relevant legislation; Page No 18 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 18 Not use council information for personal purposes; Not disclose any information discussed during a confidential session of a Council meeting; 9.8 You must carry out your duties in a manner that allows councillors, members of staff, delegates and the public to remain informed about local government activity and practices. 9.9 You must not use confidential information gained through your official position for the purpose of securing a private benefit for yourself or for any other person. 9.10 You must not seek or obtain, either directly or indirectly, any financial benefit or other improper advantage for yourself, or any other person or body, from any information to which you had access in the exercise of your official functions or duties by virtue of your office or position. 9.11 You must not use confidential information with the intention to improperly cause harm or detriment to your council. Security of information 9.12 You must take care to maintain the integrity and security of confidential documents or information in your possession, or for which you are responsible. 9.13 You must comply with the information protection principles, council’s privacy management plan and legislation when dealing with personal information. Personal information is information or an opinion about a person whose identity is apparent, or can be determined from the information or opinion. Use of council resources 9.14 You must use council resources ethically, effectively, efficiently and carefully in the course of your public or profes sional duties, and must not use them for private purposes (except when supplied as part of a contract of employment) unless this use is lawfully authorised and proper payment is made where appropriate. 9.15 You must be scrupulous in your use of council property, official services and facilities and should not permit their misuse by any other person or body. 9.16 You must avoid any action or situation which could create the impression that council property, official services or public facilities are being improperly used for your own or any other person or body’s private benefit or gain. Page No 19 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 19 9.17 The interests of a Councillor in thei r re-election is considered to be a personal interest and as such the reimbursement of travel expenses incurred on election matters is not appropriate. The use of Council letterhead, Council crests and other information that gives the impression it is official Council material must not be used for these purposes. 9.18 You must not convert any property of the Council to your own use unless properly authorised. 9.19 You must not use Council’s computer resources to search for, access, download or communicate any material of an offensive, obscene, pornographic, threatening, abusive or defamatory nature. In the case of Council staff this is likely to constitute a disciplinary offence. Councillor access to Council buildings 9.20 As elected members of the Council, councillors are entitled to have access to the Council Chamber, committee room, Mayor’s office (subject to the Mayor’s approval), Councillor’s rooms, and public areas of Council’s buildings during normal business hours and for meetings. Should Councillors need access to these facilities at other times, authority is required from the General Manager in order that necessary arrangements can be made. 9.21 Councillors must not enter staff-only areas of Council buildings without the approval of the General Manager (or delegate) or as provided in the procedures governing the interaction of Councillors and Council staff. 9.22 Councillors must ensure that when they are within a staff area they are cognisant of potential conflict or pecuniary interest matters and /or a perception that they may bring influence to bear on Council staff decisions and should conduct themselves accordingly. Page No 20 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 20 10 Reporting Breaches, complaint handling procedures & sanctions Corrupt conduct, maladminis tration and waste of public resources 10.1 You have an obligation to act honestly and to report any instances of suspected corrupt conduct, maladministration and serious and substantial waste of public resources in accordance with council’s internal reporting policy. 10.2 The Protected Disclosures Act 1994 provides certain protections against reprisals for council officials who report such matters. It is an offence to take detrimental action against people who make such reports. Reporting breaches of the code of conduct 10.3 You also have an obligation to report suspected breaches of the code of conduct to the General Manager. Investigation procedures – staff conduct (e xcluding the general manager) 10.4 The General Manager will investigate breaches of the code of conduct regarding Council staff and others engaged by the Council and will determine the matter. Investigation procedures – Coun cillor and General Manager conduct 10.5 Council will establish a Conduct Commit tee that will consist of the Mayor, the General Manager and Council’s nominated legal adviser or other independentperson of appropriate standing. In the instance of a complaint being madeagainst the Mayor or the General Manager, the Deputy Mayor will take the place of the Mayor or General Manager on the Committee. 10.6 Councillors must report suspected breaches of the Code of Conduct to the General Manager in the first instance and refrain from making allegations at open Council meetings. The General Manager is responsible for reporting the matter to the Conduct Committee. 10.7 Where a Councillor believes that the General Manager has failed to comply with this Code, the Councillor should report the matter to the Mayor who will report the matter to the Conduct Committee. Page No 21 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 21 10.8 Council’s Conduct Committee will be responsible for the investigation of allegations of breaches of the Code of conduct by Councillors and must either: Investigate the alleged breach; or Engage an independent person to investigate the allegation. 10.9 An investigation conducted by the General Manager or the Conduct Committee will follow the rules of procedural fairness. The investigator must: Inform the person/s against whose interests a decision may be made of any allegations against them and the substance of any adverse comment in respect of them; Provide the person/s with a reasonable opportunity to put their case; Hear all parties to a matter and consider submissions; Make reasonable inquiries or investigations before making a decision; Ensure that no person decides a case in which they have a direct interest; Act fairly and without bias, and Conduct the investigation without undue delay. 10.10 Council’s Conduct Committee must decide whether a matter reported to it under this policy reveals a breach. The Committee may recommend that Council take any actions provided for in this policy that it considers reasonable in the circumstances. Sanctions 10.11 Where the Council finds that a Councillor has breached the code, it may decide by resolution to: Require the Councillor to apologise to any person adversely affected by the Breach; Counsel the Councillor; Reprimand the Councillor; Censure the Councillor; Make public disclosures of inappropriate conduct; Refer the matter to an appropriate investigative body, if the matter is serious (for example, the Department of Local Government, the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the NSW Ombudsman or the NSW Police); Prosecute for any breach of law. 10.12 Sanctions for staff depend on the severity, scale and importance of the breach and must be in accordance with any staff agreements, awards, industrial agreements and contracts. Page No 22 Camden Council - Code of Conduct Page 22 11 Councillor misbehaviour 11.1 For the purposes of Chapter 14, Part 1, Division 3 of the Act, failure by a councillor to comply with an applicable requirement of this Code of Conduct constitutes misbehaviour. (Section 44OF) 11.2 Under section 44OG, a Council may by resolution at a meeting formally censure a Councillor for misbehaviour. 11.3 Under section 44OH, the process for the suspension of a Councillor from civic office can be initiated by a request made by council to the Director General of the Department of Local Government. 11.4 The first ground on which a Councillor may be suspended from civic office is where the Councillor’s behavio ur has been disruptive over a period, involving more than one incident of misbehaviour during that period, and the pattern of behaviour during that period, and the pattern of behaviour during that period is of such sufficiently serious nature as to warrant the Councillor’s suspension. 11.5 Council cannot request suspension on this ground unless during the period concerned the Councillor has been: Formally censured for incidents of misbehaviour on at least one occasion; Expelled from a meeting of the Council or a committee of the Council for an incident of misbehaviour on at least one occasion. 11.6 The second ground on which a councillor may be suspended from civic office is where the Councillor’s behaviour has involved one incident of misbehaviour that is of such a sufficiently serious nature as to warrant the Councillor’s suspension. 11.7 Council cannot request suspension on this ground unless the Councillor has been: Formally censured for the incident of misbehaviour concerned; or Expelled from a meeting of the Council or a committee of the Council for the incident of misbehaviour concerned. 11.8 Under section 44OH, the process for the suspension of a councillor can also be initiated by the Department of Local Government, the independent Commission Against Corruption or the NSW Ombudsman Bookmarks No bookmarks found. (top) |
|
The Camden New journal article is here. http://www.thecnj.com/camden/083007/news083007_06.html (top) The text and my comment
that may or may not appear follows.
He added: “People who are parking evaders are often
involved in other kinds of things. (OOPS
forgot to mention parking enforcers that evade the rules and
pursue non compliant unenforcible are not persistent at the rate
of 7-10,000 PCNS a week!) Very interesting. Since most of these relate to
the past YEAR, most of them are probably illegal and
unenforcible, TWO issues make this so, the Your Comments:..... Very interesting. Since
most of these relate to the past YEAR, most of them are probably
illegal and unenforcible, TWO issues make this so, the "2
date" issue and the "YOU" issue Both ruled non
compliant at PATAS for APPEALS so its really a treble sting.
I
wonder if the Journal sides with truth and justice or Camden and
their maladministration. |
|
CAMDEN
NEW JOURNAL ARE THEY A FREE PRESS? For truth about Camden
council, read the Ham & High.
|
|
Comments as you read it.. It has been said. (top)
|
|
A FORMER traffic
warden has lifted the lid on Camden's parking regime - claiming
that wardens get cash bonuses if they slap large numbers of
tickets on o July 2006: The new council abolishes clamping, except the most "persistent evaders". o March 2007: Figures
reveal the new council has made a £18.8million profit on
parking in its first year, £3.8million more than the
previous year under
|
Note: Parts of this site are taken from my own writing, and parts are 'ghost' written for me with my approval.